Image via WikipediaI think that one of the biggest mistakes our society is making right now is the attitude of “disposability” when it comes to our STUFF.
I’m not sure if our “throw away society” can be blamed on consumers or manufacturers. I suspect it’s a combination of the two. Consumer demand for products at the lowest possible price leads to manufacturers cutting corners in their product quality. It also goes in the manufacturers favour to have items that require replacing more often.
So, who is the loser here? The environment. We’re chewing through resources at the rate of knots and throwing it all into landfill just as quickly.
To be honest, understanding the whole landfill issue was something I remained blissfully unaware of (well, to a certain degree at least) until we had to start dealing with our own waste. We don’t have a convenient garbage pick-up service here. We have to deal with our own.
And it can be quite a SHOCK to the system to have in front of you a couple of years worth of landfill that has been generated by you and only you.
However, here is where I find a certain amount of conflict. Often-times, frugality and environmentalism go hand in hand.
That isn’t ALWAYS the case though.
Anything that involves technology may well create a conflict between frugality and environmentalism.
If you buy the cheaper model, will it end up in landfill quicker?
If you buy the more expensive model, will it’s technology be outdated faster than it wears out? And do the more expensive models really last longer?
Farmboy and I were caught in this dilemma about a year ago. Our television died. Do we repair it or put the cost of repair toward a new television?
We thought we’d done the “right” thing when we purchased it originally, opting for a Sony rather than a cheaper brand.
However, it was only a 51cm television and with Farmboy’s failing eyesight, was this a prime opportunity (ie excuse) to purchase something larger, with newer technology?
After discussions with our local electronics store, we decided that perhaps it was worth fixing. And spent around $100 repairing the television.
A couple of days ago, the television died again. Making us question the sensibility of having spent money on it 12 months ago, only to have it now no longer working again.
I guess this time we’ll replace it. I feel disappointed that our efforts to do what we felt was the “right” thing haven’t paid off. And now we’re left wondering what we’ll do the next time we’re faced with the decision of “repair or replace”.
What would you have done in our position?
Are there certain things you would repair rather than replace?
Do you find it easy to put environmental considerations ahead of frugal ones?
Can anyone recommend a television brand for under $500 (we haven’t decided on a size yet but preferably larger than 51cm - not that we fully understand the way the sizing works these days)? We’re thinking it’s not really worth spending extra money for a “better quality” brand but there are so many alternatives out there, it’s hard to know which way to go.
